I read your post comparing Lucy Liu’s casting to the Hamlet movies, and I think you have a really good point, and I think the rest of the fandom is probably being little assholes about it, and I’m personally excited about the casting, but I just wanted to throw in my two cents: I think I will be peeved /if/ the writers create a relationship between Sherlock and Joan. And that’s because I don’t see it as (continued-)
I don’t see it as the writers “not seeing gender” in their consideration of whether or not a relationship is possible. I see it as, though it doesn’t matter which character, Hamlet or Horatio, is female, it /does/ matter that one of them is female and one of them is male, or else their relationship is only platonic. Which is heteronormative and problematic. If that makes sense?

Right! They definitely take gender into account. If Sherlock and Joan end up in a romantic entanglement in this version, it will definitely be because one of them is a woman. And I think it’s extremely problematic that it has to be this way. But on the other hand, it would mean that someone’s taken into account the romantic possibilities of this relationship and choosing to build their interpretation off of that - and having it be something concrete and real, not homophobic teasing a la BBC and Guy Ritchie.

It could be excellent! It could be a shitshow. Either way, I’m getting excited.

0 notes
posted 2 months ago

with gay porn and musical numbers*




Cross. 18. INFP. Human disaster. My patronus is the NONONONO cat. I like my men like I like my coffee: I'm a tea drinker.
Shakespeare. Dramaturgy. Historical dramas. Rome, Tudors, Borgias. Bomb Girls. Disney movies (and villains). Star Trek. Parks and Recreation. The ladies of Doctor Who. Game of Thrones. Rule 63.
My proudest achievement is that one time I liveblogged Hamlet porn.
I recently read Homestuck and now my blog is 50% johnkat. Sorry about that.
Sometimes I unironically reblog High School Musical. If you don't like that, you should really not follow me.
Sidebar image by morbidezza.
*a method of taking one's own that is less efficent, though more flamboyant, than fire and blood.